Tag: testamentary trusts

31 May

Testamentary trusts – they’re not dead yet

Suzana Popovic-Montag Estate & Trust, Estate Planning, Hull on Estates, In the News, Trustees, Wills Tags: , , , , , 0 Comments

Remember the good old days? Vacations without smartphones, real letters in your mailbox, tax-effective testamentary trusts? Ah yes, those testamentary trusts.

Before 2016, income and realized capital gains within most testamentary trusts were taxed favourably in the trust, at graduated personal tax rates, not the top tax rates associated with inter vivos trusts. It was an estate planning tool that let many trust beneficiaries, typically spouses or other family members of the deceased, lower their overall taxes through income splitting, with trust earnings taxed in the trust and the beneficiary’s other income taxed personally.

Today, testamentary trusts are taxed at the highest marginal rate, with only two exceptions:

  1. Graduated Rate Estates – which are trusts arising as a consequence of the death of a testator, rather than because a trust was expressly provided for by the terms of a will. These are still taxable at marginal rates for the first 36 months after the testator’s death; and
  2. A Qualified Disability Trust, which is a testamentary trust with a beneficiary who qualifies for the disability tax credit. These trusts are still taxable at marginal rates.

With the graduated tax rate advantage now eliminated, those planning their estates are weighing alternatives, specifically alter ego and joint partner trusts that are available to those age 65 and older. Advisor.ca has a good discussion of these alternatives in light of the new tax treatment of testamentary trusts: http://www.advisor.ca/tax/estate-planning/alternatives-to-testamentary-trusts-158703.

But it’s also important to remember that testamentary trusts can still play an important role in estate planning, even without the benefit of graduated tax rates. Testamentary trusts can still be beneficial from a tax standpoint if beneficiaries have low levels of income, they still offer protection from creditors, and they’re still a very effective tool in second marriage situations, providing income to a second spouse for their lifetime and capital to children from a first marriage thereafter.

This Globe and Mail article provides a good overview of the many potential uses of testamentary trusts today: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/taxes/consider-these-testamentary-trusts-in-your-will/article27031380/.

While the good old days for testamentary trusts may be over, there’s still life left in this estate planning structure in a number of situations.

Thanks for reading … Have a great day.
Suzana Popovic-Montag

11 Mar

Planning Considerations for Qualified Disability Trusts

Lisa-Renee Estate & Trust, Estate Planning, RRSPs/Insurance Policies, Trustees, Wills Tags: , , , , , , , , 0 Comments

Earlier this week I blogged about planning considerations for establishing a testamentary trust that may qualify as a graduated rate estate.  To continue on the topic of planning consideration in light of the recent changes to the Income Tax Act, I thought it would be fitting to highlight some considerations regarding the newly introduced Qualified Disability Trust (the “QDT”).

moneyOne planning technique that is commonly used when disabled beneficiaries are involved is a Henson Trust.  It is important that testators understand that the creation of a Henson Trust does not automatically qualify as a QDT since the disabled beneficiary must be a recipient of the Disability Tax Credit.  Accordingly, it would be prudent to highlight that it is possible that the income earned from the Henson Trust may be subject to top-rate taxation.

It is also quite common for a testator to identify the beneficiaries of a testamentary trust as a class of beneficiaries such as children or issue.  However, given that testamentary trusts are now taxed at the highest rates, a testator may wish to specifically name the beneficiaries of the Trust in the event that the named beneficiary becomes disabled during the length of the testamentary trust.  In doing so, the testator will have satisfied one of the requirements for the Trust to be designated as a QDT.

The limit of one QDT election per beneficiary also raises some estate planning challenges.  It may be necessary to explore planning solutions in situations where the named beneficiary of an insurance trust and a testamentary trust is disabled. In this case, the testator may want to consider whether both trusts are necessary.

It is extremely important that clients understand the estate planning challenges that arise when attempting to take advantage of the graduated rate of taxation, and should discuss any estate planning options with a tax professional before a final decision is made.

Thanks for reading!

Lisa Haseley

You might also like:
Qualified Disability Trusts
Graduated Rates and Changes to the Income Tax Act
More Changes to the Taxation of Testamentary Trusts

08 Mar

Planning Considerations for Graduated Rate Estates

Lisa-Renee Beneficiary Designations, Estate & Trust, Estate Planning, Executors and Trustees, Trustees Tags: , , , , , , , , 0 Comments

Our blog has previously discussed Graduated Rate Estates (“GRE”) and changes to the Income Tax Act, which now limit the benefit of graduated rates of taxation for up to 36 months from the date of death if the estate qualifies as a testamentary trust, and is designated as a GRE in its first taxation year.

MoneyChanges to the tax benefits of testamentary trusts raise a number of planning considerations that should be considered when making an estate plan.  First, when drafting a testamentary trust, a key consideration should be whether it would be beneficial to the estate and its beneficiaries to delay the distribution of the estate for up to three years to potentially maximize the progressive taxation rates of all income in the trust.

If a testamentary trust is established with a view to take advantage of the new tax regime, then another important consideration is the extent of discretion that a testator wishes to grant to his or her Estate Trustee. Since an estate must maintain its status as a GRE, a testator may wish to clearly direct his or her Estate Trustee to take steps necessary to use or manage the estate assets in a manner that is consistent with the GRE requirements set out in section 248(1) of the Income Tax Act.   Alternatively, the testator may wish to authorize his or her Estate Trustee to determine whether it is necessary or beneficial to preserve the estate’s status as a GRE in light of circumstances that may arise post-mortem.

All estate planning considerations that are intended to take advantage of changes to the Income Tax Act should be discussed with a tax professional throughout the estate planning process.

Thanks for reading!

Lisa Haseley

30 Nov

Secret Trusts – How to prove one and what happens if it fails?

Ian Hull Estate & Trust Tags: , , , , , , , , , , 0 Comments

Secret and half-secret trusts are trust arrangements made between a testator and a trustee, without disclosure of the terms of the arrangement, but where an understanding exists between the parties. Secret trusts are not mentioned at all in a testator’s will. Half-secret trusts are explicitly included in a will, but the terms of the trust are not disclosed.

There are certain requirements that must be met in order to form a secret or a half-secret trust. With respect to secret trusts, there are four required elements, as per Ottaway v Norman [1971] 3 All ER 1325 at 1332 (“Ottaway v Norman”):

  • An intent by the testator to subject the trustee to an obligation in favour of a beneficiary;
  • Communication of that intent to the trustee;
  • Acceptance of the obligation by the trustee, either expressly or implicitly; and
  • The conditions are satisfied before or after execution of the will, but before the testator dies.

With respect to half-secret trusts, the timing of the communication and acceptance is different: it must occur before or at the time of execution of the will.

Due to the nature of these types of trusts, there can be issues proving their existence. Section 13 of the Ontario Evidence Act, RSO 190, C.E-23, requires corroboration.

Accordingly, as in Re Dhaliwal Estate, 2011 ABQB 279 (“Re Dhaliwal”), where the only evidence of the existence of the alleged secret trust were the affidavits of the chief beneficiaries of the trust, the required corroboration was not provided.

According to Re Snowden [1979] CH 528, the standard of proof for proving a secret or half-secret trust is the normal civil standard (i.e. balance of probabilities).

As per Ottaway v Norman, where a secret trust fails, the trustee will be entitled to the trust property absolutely with no obligation to the beneficiary. By contrast, if a half-secret trust were to fail, there would be an automatic resulting trust in favour of the testator’s estate. The distinction is due to the fact that, in the case of a half-secret trust, the will explicitly states that the trustee has no beneficial interest in the trust property.

Thanks for reading.

Ian Hull

17 Aug

Graduated Rate Estates and Changes to the Income Tax Act

Ian Hull Estate Planning Tags: , , , , , , 0 Comments

The 2015 Budget and changes to tax treatment of testamentary trusts have been discussed on this blog before. Bill C-43 has since become law, and will become effective January 1, 2016.

The amendments to the Income Tax Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.)) (the “I.T.A.”) have eliminated graduated rate taxation for testamentary trusts, which were previously taxed at rates applicable to individuals. Starting next year, testamentary trusts will be taxed at the highest marginal rate of taxation, subject to a couple of exceptions, one of which applies to a testamentary trust that can be considered a Graduated Rate Estate (GRE). The purpose of these amendments is to try to eliminate unequal treatment of testamentary trusts as compared to inter vivos trusts, which are taxed at the highest marginal tax rate, while testamentary trusts have enjoyed graduated rates for decades.

Starting December 31, 2015, the I.T.A. s. 248(1) will contain a definition for a GRE. In order to qualify as a GRE and benefit from graduated rates of taxation, no more than 36 months can have passed after the death of the testator whose estate established the trust, it must designate itself as a GRE, and only one GRE can be designated per individual. Going forward, as noted in this article from a national law firm, only GREs may benefit from graduated tax rates, use certain loss carry-back provisions, and have a non-calendar year end.

Another exception to the elimination of graduated rates of taxation applies to a qualified disability trust. The I.T.A. s. 122(3) states that in order to be a qualified disability trust, it must: (i) be a testamentary trust; (ii) the beneficiaries of the trust must have made a joint election with the trust for the trust to be a qualified disability trust, and (iii) s. 118.3(1)(a) to (b) must apply to such beneficiaries.

There have also been changes to treatment of charitable donations made in a Will. Whereas, in the past, a charitable gift was considered to be made immediately preceding the death of the testator, the new rules provide that the gift is made at the time it is actually transferred to the donee. The value of the property will also be determined on this basis. The amount of the charitable donation can then be allocated between the deceased or the GRE, as per I.T.A. s. 118.1(1), as long as the Estate can be considered a GRE at the time. The amount of the gift can be deducted by the deceased in the year the donation was made or used in the preceding taxation year. Alternatively, the gift can be deducted by the GRE in the year of the donation, carried forward, or carried back for up to the 36 months that a GRE may exist as such.

Thank you for reading.

Ian Hull

29 Apr

More Changes to the Taxation of Testamentary Trusts

Hull & Hull LLP Estate & Trust, In the News Tags: , , , 0 Comments

On April 23, 2015, the Ontario Government released its 2015 Budget.  Among other things, the Budget proposes changes to the taxation of testamentary trusts.

Traditionally, inter vivos trusts (those created by an individual during their lifetime) have paid tax at the highest individual income tax rates, whereas testamentary trusts (which are created by a will) have enjoyed taxation at marginal rates. The income earned with respect to testamentary trusts has traditionally been taxed on a separate tax return, and as such, many have used testamentary trust as a means to income split, significantly minimizing their overall taxes payable.

The Federal Government in its 2014 Budget was the first to propose changes to the taxation of testamentary trusts. Specifically, the 2014 Budget announced the elimination of the favourable tax treatment enjoyed by testamentary trusts, such that all trust income would be taxed at the highest marginal rates, and in a similar manner to the taxation of inter vivos trusts.

Draft Federal legislation was subsequently proposed in August, 2014 and was formally enacted in December, 2014, such that the changes would be effective at the Federal level as of January, 2016.

The 2015 Ontario Budget now proposes the implementation of these Federal legislative changes to the taxation of testamentary trusts at the Provincial level.

The changes would mean that testamentary trusts will be taxed at the highest marginal rate with only two exceptions:

a) Graduated Rate Estates (trusts arising as a consequence of the death of a testator rather than because expressly provided for by the terms of a will) would still be taxable at marginal rates, for the first 36 months after the testator’s death; and

b) A Qualified Disability Trust, i.e. a testamentary trust with a beneficiary who qualifies for the disability tax credit, would still be eligible for marginal rates.

In addition, the 2015 Ontario Budget proposes that Ontario tax credit for charitable donations over $200 would be raised to 17.41% for trusts that pay the top marginal personal tax rate.

The government will introduce legislative amendments to implement these measures which, if passed, will take effect January, 2016.

Thank you for reading.

Suzana Popovic-Montag


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.