Tag: lottery

23 May

Can you win the lottery and remain anonymous?

Ian Hull Estate & Trust, Estate Planning, Uncategorized Tags: , , , , 0 Comments

When it comes to money matters, privacy is a big issue. We see it all the time in the estates area – a great deal of time and planning can go into ensuring that estate details remain confidential.

Of course, the need for privacy can be even more important during your lifetime, especially if your wealth is substantial – or suddenly becomes substantial. You may have read about a recent U.S. lottery winner of $560 million who went to court to argue that she should receive the prize but was entitled to remain anonymous.

Based on New Hampshire law, she was successful. And there are a handful of U.S. states that allow lottery winners to remain anonymous. Unfortunately, if you were ever to win the big one in Canada and claim a major lottery prize, your hopes of having this new wealth fly under the radar are slim indeed, although there have been rare exceptions.

No privacy for lottery winners in Canada

Provincial lottery corporations have rules that require winners to publicly disclose their identity and take part in lottery public relations activities, such as having their photo taken with an oversized cheque. The corporations argue that this is necessary for transparency (showing that someone did indeed win the jackpot) and for promoting future draws.

Many Canadian winners have argued that they should be able to remain anonymous. One B.C. man who recently won $50 million argued that the ownership of the ticket had been transferred to a trust, and that the trust could collect the winnings. The lottery corporation stuck to its guns and held that only an individual or group of individuals could claim a prize. After 21 months of haggling, the winner had the trust transfer the ticket back to himself and he collected his prize, with full publicity.

An Ontario individual, however, was recently successful in convincing the lottery corporation to mute all publicity about their win. The lottery folks would only say that the personal circumstances of the individual were “rare” but would not release details of what those rare circumstances were.

All to say, if you play the lottery in Canada, it’s a safe bet that you’ll be smiling for the camera if you win.

Thank you for reading … Have a great day,
Ian Hull

03 Aug

All the More Reason to Put a Ring On It

Hull & Hull LLP Joint Accounts, Litigation Tags: , , , , , , , , 0 Comments

A Nova Scotia judge recently ruled that a lottery prize was not assumed to be mutual asset to be divided upon the breakdown of a common-law relationship.

The National Post recently reported on a man and a woman who had been living together for a number of years and had won $50,000 on a scratch-and-win ticket. The ticket had been purchased by the man. Notwithstanding the fact that the couple had previously shared winnings, the winnings were deposited into a joint account, and part of the winnings were used for a down payment on a property that they both owned, the court found that there was no prior agreement to share the winnings.

(In another recent Ontario case, the judge found that in absence of cogent evidence of a clear intent to share winnings, there will be no requirement to share.)

Had the couple been married, there would have been a presumption that the lottery winnings were joint.

In Ontario, s. 14 of the Family Law Act creates a presumption that in the case of married spouses, the fact that property is held in the names of spouses as joint tenants is proof, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the spouses intended to own the property as joint tenants, and money on deposit in the name of both spouses shall be deemed to be in the name of the spouses as joint tenants. The provision does not apply to common-law spouses.

What are the possible lessons from this?

  1. If you are buying lottery tickets with someone else, be they a friend or unmarried spouse, have some agreement in place to share the winnings.
  2. As Beyonce says, if you liked it, then you should have put a ring on it.

Thank you for reading.

Paul E. Trudelle – Click here for more information on Paul Trudelle.

11 Jan


Hull & Hull LLP Estate & Trust Tags: , , , , , , 0 Comments

Two certainties and a long-shot.

The Toronto Star reported on January 4, 2009 that on the day Donald Peters died, he unknowingly provided financial security for his wife of 59 years, and for their family.

Peters bought two Connecticut Lottery tickets on November 1, 2008. He died of a heart attack later that day. His wife, in her grief, didn’t check the tickets until some time later. In fact, she states that she almost threw them out before checking them. On January 2, 2009, she collected the winning prize of $10,000,000 (U.S.).

Considering this matter from an estate administration angle, a number of potential questions or issues arise.

For example, in Ontario, would Estate Administration Tax (“E.A.T.”) be payable on the winnings under the Estates Administration Tax Act? E.A.T. on $10,000,000 would be approximately $150,000.

E.A.T. under the Act is payable based on the “value of the estate”, the stripped-down definition of which is the value of all the property that belonged to the deceased at the time of his or her death. Presuming the lottery took place after death, the value of the ticket at the date of death would likely be its face value or purchase price. Until the lottery takes place, a $1 ticket is, in most cases, only worth $1. (Believe me, I’ve tried to sell them for more, but my family wouldn’t pay my asking price, no matter how lucky I told them the ticket was.)

However, if the draw was pre-death, but the ticket wasn’t checked until post-death, then one would presume that the winnings would need to be included as property belonging to the deceased at the time of death, and E.A.T. would be payable on the winnings.

Good luck and good health,

Paul Trudelle


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.