Skip to content
Hull and Hull LLP
  • Home
  • About
  • Lawyers
  • Knowledge
  • Contact
Hull and Hull LLP
  • Home
  • About
  • Lawyers
  • Knowledge
  • Contact
Hull and Hull LLP Knowledge
  • All
  • Articles
  • News / Events
  • The Probater
  • Solicitor's Tips
  • Podcasts
  • Webinars / Videos

Estate Trustee’s Duty to Account is Emphasized Once Again in Huang v. Nie, 2024 ONSC 2398

By Hull & Hull LLP | February 4, 2025 | 3 minutes of reading

Yesterday, I blogged about some of the key considerations and challenges you may want to take into account when choosing an estate trustee to administer your estate. Having an estate trustee who is responsible and possesses the right skill set will ensure that the estate is properly administered and will minimize the risk of unnecessary legal proceedings.

One of the duties of an estate trustee includes keeping meticulous records of the financial state and transactions of the estate in order to be prepared to account to the beneficiaries. Huang v. Nie represents just one example of many where the estate trustee did not appear to fully understand their role and its accompanying duties, and had failed to account to the beneficiary.

In this case, the deceased died on September 23, 2019, without a Will. The Applicant is the deceased’s 17‑year‑old son, and the Respondent is the deceased’s widow. Both parties are beneficiaries of the estate.

The Respondent applied for and received a Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee Without a Will. In her application, the Respondent stated that the approximate value of the estate was $651,137.89, comprising two bank accounts and real estate. The Respondent also cited her intention to hold the Applicant’s interest as a guardian for property.

Since the Applicant was a minor, the Ontario Children’s Lawyer (the “OCL”) expressed concerns about the Respondent’s plan and had repeatedly requested particulars with respect to the financial state of the estate, including a list of assets owned by the deceased at the date of death, a list of debts at the date of death, and a list of all disbursements since the date of death. The OCL made multiple requests to obtain the required information, which the Respondent ignored. Ultimately, the OCL served the Respondent with an application record, to which the Respondent did not file any responding materials.

The court expressed concern over the estate trustee’s management of the estate. The court noted that more than 4.5 years had passed since the deceased’s date of death, and more than 2 years had passed since the Respondent was appointed as estate trustee, giving her plenty of time to administer a simple estate. The Respondent’s conduct reflected poorly on her ability to administer the estate, especially given her lack of cooperation with the OCL and her inability to properly safeguard her son’s interest in the estate. Therefore, it was not surprising when the court ordered the Respondent to pass her accounts.

In this particular case the estate trustee was not chosen by the deceased, however, it is not unusual for individuals to select their spouse as the estate trustee of their choice. While this decision can work out in some cases, it could backfire in others, especially if the spouse does not have a full understanding of the scope of the role and their duties. If you are inclined to choose a spouse, friend, or close relative to administer your estate, it’s important to set aside your emotional connection to that person and carefully consider whether they are truly the right fit for the role.

Thank you for reading.

Margarita Grup


Related Posts

No related posts.

Previous

TIPS FOR GIFTING A RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP

Next

From Filing to Service: How Ontario’s Rule 16.01(2) Simplifies Litigation

Subscribe to Hull & Hull LLP Knowledge E-mail List(s)

Complete the following form to sign up receive email communications from Hull & Hull LLP.

We send three types of communications: our quarterly Probater Newsletter, monthly Solicitor's Tips, and a daily summary of articles from our blog. By default you will receive all communications. You may set your personal preferences by deslecting the options below.

Thank you!

Hull and Hull LLP logo

Contact

Practice Areas

Hull e-State Planner

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2026 Hull and Hull LLP

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}